The premise that the DOJ decides when and how Law is applied is patently absurd puerile Logical fallacy. I find it hilarious existential a surditu that any Rational human being would even accept such vapid nonsense as Reasonable argument, let alone Logically Certain Propositional congruence. It's an irrationally idiotic contradiction of Logic.
Law is a function of Logic, not opinion.
Opinion is not Logic. Logic is not opinion. Opinion is inherent fallacy of Logic. Opinion is moot-point - even for those ignorant of, or cognitively confused by, Logic/Reason.
Cowardice is the only motivation for any citizen of the United States of America to accept such obvious criminal violation of the very premise of Law. No. The DOJ does NOT have any Lawful authority to do anything but submit to the Law like everyone else! Not even the DOJ is above-the-law! That is irrefutable axiomatic Logical Certainty of the premise of Law and our Constitution aka our Supreme Law of the Land.
The DOJ does not decide Law. It administers Justice. The 'People' decide Law via Congress. That's irrefutable axiomatic Logical Certainty of the very Law legitimatizing our Government, and every agent of Government - Public, or Civil Servant. Agents of Government are lawfully obliged to Constitutional Law without exception.
The United States Constitution is the very Standard of Law in the United States of America. Nobody's opinion changes anything about the U.S. Constitution. Not even the Supreme Court.
The Constitution is a mere 6 pages of Propositional Statements of Law. Two pages per branch of Government. Seriously, one must be feeble of Mind or illiterate of English to not understand the Constitution without question. It's intentionally written as axiomatic and irrefutable for the literate... All one must do is read. There is no refuting the Propositional/Predicate Logic or lack thereof for any written document. All Language operates upon immutable axioms of Propositional/Predicate Logic. Anyone contradicting this axiomatic Logic is either an arrogant fool, manipulative Psychopath, or feeble of Mind.
Propositional Statements by definition are axiomatic and require no interpretation whatsoever except for those illiterate of the Language in which they are written.
Moreover, the Truth Value of a Propositional Statement is axiomatic. It is the epitome of arrogant ignorance for any literate adult Human Being to be ignorant of Propositional Statements. They are one of the first functions of Language that we learn, when learning to read/write.
Language operates upon immutable axioms of Propositional/Predicate Logic. It always has, and always will. Logic originates in the Mind, and is fundamental to human cognition. All human knowledge is dependent upon Logic. Without the immutable axioms of Propositional/Predicate Logic upon which Language operate, we would have incomprehensible useless gibberish, not Language. Knowledge is dependent upon Language, and Language is dependent upon Logic. No Logic = no Language. No Language = no Gnosis. No Gnosis = no Law. No Law = no Justice. Logic is not Rocket Science even if Rocket Science exists as a discipline of Logic.
Logic is Truth.
Opinion is Fiction.
Fictional stories are the expression of opinion even when Propositional/Predicate Logic is used to create them. Stories are inherently binary, as Logic is inherently binary - Truth Value is True or False therefore stories are either True or they are False/Fiction. There is no middle state of Statements. An incongruent Statement is inherently false.
The opinion that the U.S. DOJ can arbitrarily decide Law is Fictional opinion ignorant of Logic, Reason, and Law. It's an inherently cowardly opinion.
The premise that the DOJ decides when and how Law is applied is patently absurd puerile Logical fallacy. I find it hilarious existential a surditu that any Rational human being would even accept such vapid nonsense as Reasonable argument, let alone Logically Certain Propositional congruence. It's an irrationally idiotic contradiction of Logic.
Law is a function of Logic, not opinion.
Opinion is not Logic. Logic is not opinion. Opinion is inherent fallacy of Logic. Opinion is moot-point - even for those ignorant of, or cognitively confused by, Logic/Reason.
Cowardice is the only motivation for any citizen of the United States of America to accept such obvious criminal violation of the very premise of Law. No. The DOJ does NOT have any Lawful authority to do anything but submit to the Law like everyone else! Not even the DOJ is above-the-law! That is irrefutable axiomatic Logical Certainty of the premise of Law and our Constitution aka our Supreme Law of the Land.
The DOJ does not decide Law. It administers Justice. The 'People' decide Law via Congress. That's irrefutable axiomatic Logical Certainty of the very Law legitimatizing our Government, and every agent of Government - Public, or Civil Servant. Agents of Government are lawfully obliged to Constitutional Law without exception.
The United States Constitution is the very Standard of Law in the United States of America. Nobody's opinion changes anything about the U.S. Constitution. Not even the Supreme Court.
The Constitution is a mere 6 pages of Propositional Statements of Law. Two pages per branch of Government. Seriously, one must be feeble of Mind or illiterate of English to not understand the Constitution without question. It's intentionally written as axiomatic and irrefutable for the literate... All one must do is read. There is no refuting the Propositional/Predicate Logic or lack thereof for any written document. All Language operates upon immutable axioms of Propositional/Predicate Logic. Anyone contradicting this axiomatic Logic is either an arrogant fool, manipulative Psychopath, or feeble of Mind.
Propositional Statements by definition are axiomatic and require no interpretation whatsoever except for those illiterate of the Language in which they are written.
Moreover, the Truth Value of a Propositional Statement is axiomatic. It is the epitome of arrogant ignorance for any literate adult Human Being to be ignorant of Propositional Statements. They are one of the first functions of Language that we learn, when learning to read/write.
Language operates upon immutable axioms of Propositional/Predicate Logic. It always has, and always will. Logic originates in the Mind, and is fundamental to human cognition. All human knowledge is dependent upon Logic. Without the immutable axioms of Propositional/Predicate Logic upon which Language operate, we would have incomprehensible useless gibberish, not Language. Knowledge is dependent upon Language, and Language is dependent upon Logic. No Logic = no Language. No Language = no Gnosis. No Gnosis = no Law. No Law = no Justice. Logic is not Rocket Science even if Rocket Science exists as a discipline of Logic.
Logic is Truth.
Opinion is Fiction.
Fictional stories are the expression of opinion even when Propositional/Predicate Logic is used to create them. Stories are inherently binary, as Logic is inherently binary - Truth Value is True or False therefore stories are either True or they are False/Fiction. There is no middle state of Statements. An incongruent Statement is inherently false.
The opinion that the U.S. DOJ can arbitrarily decide Law is Fictional opinion ignorant of Logic, Reason, and Law. It's an inherently cowardly opinion.