Security clearances are not a right. Any former intelligence officers who used their power to meddle in a presidential election deserved to lose their clearance.
Brennan is too much. Here’s the game he’s trying to play. You see I never said that the laptop was Russian disinformation. I said it had all the hallmarks of that. Okay there is a distinction there. So when it was obvious that the news media was interpreting this statement to mean that this was disinformation , how come Brennan never pointed out , that isn’t what I said. How come, when it was clear the laptop wasn’t disinformation, Brennan never pointed out that while it might have had the hallmarks of disinformation, it wasn’t. Well the answer is obvious. Of course he wanted people to think the laptop was disinformation, even though he probably never believed it was but when the truth came out, he wanted to claim it was disinformation. A kind of plausible deniability strategy , that actually isn’t that plausible. I’ve always been intrigued by the fact that the head of the CIA was at one point- 1976- a supporter of the Communist Party. I mean after the Khrushchev speech, the Hungarian Revolution and the 68 invasion of Czechoslovakia, this guy supported the resolutely pro Russian CPUSA? And he became head of the CIA ! There’s something wrong with that picture. How did that happen?
The question should be this: When will the mainstream media stop acting like every human being alive has such short memories that they think they can lie their way into and past anything? They've literally lost their sanity - They've been outsmarted and proven wrong, which has, in turn, hurt their credibility. But it seems like MSM is intent on putting their credibility into even more jeopardy that it's already in, while they still have it in their heads that they're telling the truth.
If you want any real facts here, it's that they're going to spit out whatever the intel community tells them to, get caught, lose more credibility, then do it again. Sooner or later, even their most ardent defenders are going to turn their backs on them, and they'll somehow blame it on Trump, climate change, fascism, or a combination thereof. That's pure arrogance on MSM's part.
Except for Senator Wyden being a Marxist himself, I agree that Brennan would seem to be talking way too fast in attempting to obfuscate his agency’s spying on Its own cohorts.
Retire them all because they misused their credentials to handle a political matter when they should have kept quiet. I’m glad the President is sweeping up the dust and taking out the trash that is the deep state.
Brennan is political slime and has been for far longer than he has held a top secret clearance. His penchant for lying publicly and loudly is well known and his only relevance is to the shrinking percentage of the public dedicated to Trump's downfall. In short John Brennan can be trusted to buy groceries from a list his wife might give him. Beyond that he should be given a wide berth, as should Mark Milley, and a sizable number of former Joint Chiefs.
Brennan is too much. Here’s the game he’s trying to play. You see I never said that the laptop was Russian disinformation. I said it had all the hallmarks of that. Okay there is a distinction there. So when it was obvious that the news media was interpreting this statement to mean that this was disinformation , how come Brennan never pointed out , that isn’t what I said. How come, when it was clear the laptop wasn’t disinformation, Brennan never pointed out that while it might have had the hallmarks of disinformation, it wasn’t. Well the answer is obvious. Of course he wanted people to think the laptop was disinformation, even though he probably never believed it was but when the truth came out, he wanted to claim it was disinformation. A kind of plausible deniability strategy , that actually isn’t that plausible. I’ve always been intrigued by the fact that the head of the CIA was at one point- 1976- a supporter of the Communist Party. I mean after the Khrushchev speech, the Hungarian Revolution and the 68 invasion of Czechoslovakia, this guy supported the resolutely pro Russian CPUSA? And he became head of the CIA ! There’s something wrong with that picture. How did that happen?
That’s a slap on the wrist. They should be prosecuted.
The question should be this: When will the mainstream media stop acting like every human being alive has such short memories that they think they can lie their way into and past anything? They've literally lost their sanity - They've been outsmarted and proven wrong, which has, in turn, hurt their credibility. But it seems like MSM is intent on putting their credibility into even more jeopardy that it's already in, while they still have it in their heads that they're telling the truth.
If you want any real facts here, it's that they're going to spit out whatever the intel community tells them to, get caught, lose more credibility, then do it again. Sooner or later, even their most ardent defenders are going to turn their backs on them, and they'll somehow blame it on Trump, climate change, fascism, or a combination thereof. That's pure arrogance on MSM's part.
They all do.
Why should assholes who leave active employment have access to classified info?
Except for Senator Wyden being a Marxist himself, I agree that Brennan would seem to be talking way too fast in attempting to obfuscate his agency’s spying on Its own cohorts.
They should be tried for treason!!
They deserve to lose more than their security clearances.
Retire them all because they misused their credentials to handle a political matter when they should have kept quiet. I’m glad the President is sweeping up the dust and taking out the trash that is the deep state.
Brennan is political slime and has been for far longer than he has held a top secret clearance. His penchant for lying publicly and loudly is well known and his only relevance is to the shrinking percentage of the public dedicated to Trump's downfall. In short John Brennan can be trusted to buy groceries from a list his wife might give him. Beyond that he should be given a wide berth, as should Mark Milley, and a sizable number of former Joint Chiefs.