Not only that, but there's hypocrisy in his statements. He claims the government shouldn't interfere with reporting, yet he's perfectly fine with the government funding a contingent of the press. I'll sit here and wonder if it's ever occurred to him that, if government funds something, anything, it often comes with the incentive of the government gaining influence in that particular sphere, be it education, healthcare, the press, etc.
What he means but can’t say is it’s a crisis for the democrat party if funding is stopped because it will be harder for them to get their liberal message out.
Not only that, but there's hypocrisy in his statements. He claims the government shouldn't interfere with reporting, yet he's perfectly fine with the government funding a contingent of the press. I'll sit here and wonder if it's ever occurred to him that, if government funds something, anything, it often comes with the incentive of the government gaining influence in that particular sphere, be it education, healthcare, the press, etc.
What he means but can’t say is it’s a crisis for the democrat party if funding is stopped because it will be harder for them to get their liberal message out.