The results of Mr. Beast’s philanthropy, which is all voluntary and profit-driven, surpass government-led efforts by miles. And that’s what his critics can’t handle.
I think Mr. Beast's critics don't want any comparison with the exploitation of producers by predators in government through the highly profitable processes of tax and regulatory extortion to get the money to 'do good' by appearing to altruistically help the poor. Government's predations have done far more damage than good down through the years. The evil ALWAYS exceeds the alleged good.
Amen to this long-told but still true-as-ever sermon!
I think Mr. Beast's critics don't want any comparison with the exploitation of producers by predators in government through the highly profitable processes of tax and regulatory extortion to get the money to 'do good' by appearing to altruistically help the poor. Government's predations have done far more damage than good down through the years. The evil ALWAYS exceeds the alleged good.
I think critics are more concerned about Mr Beast harboring and protecting paedophiles.
This has been all over YouTube for a year or more. All the kidz that used to follow him are aware of it.
I had no idea. What makes you think that?