Hunter Biden Heads to Court After Attorney Refuses to Tell Judge if 'So-Called Laptop' Is His Client's

“Well, let’s clear that issue up right now. Is it your client’s laptop or not?”

I loathe politics because I think it brings out the worst in humanity. So I try to avoid writing about it on my Substack because there’s too much politics in our lives today, and I’d rather spend time writing about other things.

But after reading Jonathan Turley’s recent article on the Biden family’s disgraceful treatment of Lunden Roberts and her daughter Navy Joan, I had to go there.

For those who don’t know, Hunter Biden for years denied he was the father of Navy Joan. A DNA test, however, proved Lunden Roberts was correct: Hunter Biden is indeed the father of Navy Joan.

Yet Turley, a professor at George Washington University Law School, points out the Biden family refuses to acknowledge Navy Joan, refuses to allow the girl to use the family’s name, and is resisting ponying up more in child support.

This is the Biden family’s right, of course. But Turley is clearly angry about the family’s refusal to acknowledge Navy Joan.

“If one were to combine all of Hunter’s influence peddling, drug abuse, orgies and prostitution controversies, they would not hold a candle to the utter depravity shown toward this little girl,” Turley writes. "Even the Biden’s dogs and cats got stockings at Christmas but not their granddaughter who they have never asked to even see, let alone support."

I’m with Turley. The honorable thing to do is recognize the child, who is the flesh and blood of Hunter Biden. There is a long history of powerful family’s shunning “bastard” children, of course, but it’s one I thought was just that: ancient history.

Apparently not.

Still, there could be ‘a crushing Karmic aspect’ to the Biden family’s refusal to pony up more money to support Navy Joan.

The court is now asking questions about Hunter’s infamous laptop—which US intelligence officials falsely claimed in 2020 was ‘Russian disinformation’—which could hold information about Biden’s actual income (versus his declared income).

Biden’s counsel, however, is not talking. Even now, more than a year after it became widely accepted that Hunter Biden abandoned the laptop and the emails on it were independently authenticated, Hunter Biden’s attorney is still refusing to answer if the laptop is even his client’s.

Here is an exchange between Circuit Judge Holly Meyer and Hunter Biden’s lawyer, Brent Langdon.

Langdon: “There has never been, to my knowledge, an acknowledgment that this so-called laptop — he continuously calls it Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop …”

Meyer: “Well, let’s clear that issue up right now. Is it your client’s laptop or not?”

Langdon: “Your honor, I’m not involved in all of that stuff. It’s not my client’s laptop as far as I know.” …

Meyer: “Is it your client’s position, you’re representing to this court, that it is not his laptop?”
Langdon: “Your honor, I am not in a position to even begin to answer that question.”

Just how long Hunter Biden can continue to play this game—what laptop?—remains to be seen.

He is scheduled to be in an Arkansas courtroom on Monday for a contempt hearing in the child support case—and he may finally be forced to take responsibility for the laptop which he’s never owned up to.

It would be Karmic indeed if the child that Hunter Biden so long denied taking responsibility for is what ultimately forces him to claim the laptop—a piece of evidence that could ultimately prove extremely complicated to the Biden family.