What Star Trek Can Teach 21st Century Americans about Microaggressions
In one classic episode, Abraham Lincoln meets Lt. Uhura on the Enterprise. Things quickly get awkward.
Growing up, my father was a big Star Trek fan. As a child, I didn’t really care for the show. It was a bit too philosophical for a 9-year-old and there were no light sabers to be found.
Eventually I became a fan of the show, however. I learned to appreciate its writing, which was quite good at times, while overlooking the cheap sets and the goofier plots.
There were some really bad stories, of course, but one could ignore this because the show was often exploring big ideas: how humans understand truth; how logic and emotion can both help and inhibit our quest for truth; the nature of good and evil.
One of the wackier plots I can recall involved Kirk and Spock working with, ahem, Abraham Lincoln (or, technically, an alien projecting itself as Lincoln). They were pitted against various villains throughout history by—bear with me here—a conscious rock that wanted to understand the difference between good and evil.
Most of the episode is not worth mentioning, but there is a 30-second exchange that seems quite relevant today.
Aboard the Enterprise, Lincoln meets Lt. Uhura. This white man of the 19th century looks at this black woman of the 23rd century and says, “What a charming Negress.”
Yeah. It was awkward. (Even writing about it now I feel awkward.)
Lincoln did not mean to offend Uhura, but he quickly senses he may have committed a faux pas.
“Oh. Forgive me, my dear,” he says. “I know that in my time, some used that term as a description of property.”
Lincoln’s statement, in modern parlance, is a microaggression: “an indirect, subtle, or unintentional discrimination against members of a marginalized group.”
Microaggressions are “the new racism,” Time magazine declared nearly a decade ago. These microaggressions almost always involve transgressions much subtler than Lincoln’s clumsy remark, yet they are handled in a much different fashion in 2023.
In modern American universities, people who commit microaggressions are reported, usually anonymously, to authorities. Transgressors are often compelled to offer public apologies. Corporations, while offering regular instruction on how to avoid microaggressions, compare them to actual violence.
Perhaps such preventative actions are entirely appropriate. But I found myself prefering Uhura’s response.
“But why should I object to that term sir,” she says. “See, in our century, we’ve learned not to fear words.”
Now, of course words can hurt. But consider the context. Uhura is saying it would be silly for her to feel injury because of someone else’s lack of etiquette. A person’s ignorance of a particular custom says precisely nothing about the offended party.
Uhura’s response looks not just more mature, but more constructive. It would seem to foster mutual understanding, whereas reporting systems and punitive actions seem more likely to fuel resentment.
In response to Uhura’s reply, Lincoln bows his head slightly and offers his hand in appreciation of her grace.
“The foolishness of my century had me apologizing where no offense is given,” Lincoln replies.
It’s amazing how many things Star Trek got right in predicting our future. Alas, it seems they got this one terribly wrong. I wonder if that’s our loss.
I remember this episode now, and am so glad you shared it. What a lesson for today.
Sounds like my son... Who is now almost 30 and a big Star Trek fan, though he couldn't have cared less about Star Trek as a child.
I remember this episode very well. I have seen every episode of every iteration of Star Trek ever produced. The original series, and all subsequent derivates, and I have seen them multiple times. As a child I had every model of every spaceship from Star Trek hanging from my bedroom ceiling. Models I put together and painted myself. I also had the diorama models of every main character. Moreover, I read Gene Roddenberry's Star Trek books. But, no I do not consider myself a "Trekkie" nor have I ever been to a convention. I grew up and became an objective, accountable, and responsible adult leaving the peurile with my childhood.
Nothing about Language has changed since this episode of Star Trek. Only human attitudes, prejudices, ignorance, and social propaganda have changed. All of those things are inherently fallacious, irrational, and nonsensical - it's congruence of the axioms of Language - Propositional/Predicate Logic that prove it with Logical certainty. Opinion is moot-point.
FTR - Truth is in no way whatsoever subjective. There is only one version of Truth. Truth is a propositional word. There is only Logically certain Truth. Opinion is moot-point.
Language operates on immutable axioms of Propositional/Predicate Logic - opinion is moot-point. Those who use language without sufficient education on how Language operates have no argument. No argument exists to refute Logical certainty or axioms. Again opinion is moot-point.
Logic is not opinion. Opinion is not Logic. Logic is axiomatic.
The word "negress" is nonsense. Vapid, vacuous, nonsense based on idiotic slang invented by illiterate uneducated morons. Nigreos is the Latin word for 'Black', ergo the Spanish word for 'Black' is Negra in the feminine, and Negro in the masculine... Opinion is moot-point! The dreaded 'N' word is nothing more than ignorant, uneducated mispronunciation of the Latin/Spanish word for 'Black', and yet puerile Neurotypicals are so undereducated and indoctrinated by vapid political propaganda they're obliviously ignorant. The 'N' word is nothing more than the mispronunciation by the Arab speaking Muslim Barbery Coast pirates who operated the sub-saharan African slave trade. That is where this ignorant word originates. This irrefutably silly puerile episode of Star Trek only reaffirms this imbecilic nonsense of language & Logic - it only increases the inherent ignorance of popular sciolism surrounding genetics and human ethnicity.
The fact that the people of sub-saharan Africa are labeled by a word for a color could not be more dehumanizing, and arrogantly ignorant. If the 'N' word is mispronunciation of the Latin/Spanish for the color black - it means exactly that 'Black' and nothing more. Nonetheless - as Dr. Martin Luther King so eloquently elucidated - man is not judged by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character!
Logic does not descriminate - humans do.
This same Logically certain premise applies to the color white as well and the public ignorance of the term 'white people' is just as ignorant of genetics, Logic, and language. The word 'Caucasian' translates to 'people of the White Mountains' - the Caucasus is ancient Greek for 'White Mountains'. The term 'White People' has exactly nothing whatsoever to do with skin tone! The people from the region of the 'Caucasus mountains' are not pale skinned and fair haired. In fact the majority of Caucasians are so-called 'brown' people... Yet another inherently dehumanizing reduction of people to an inaccurate description based on color alone! Most humans are completely ignorant of the genetic fact that 'White People' - Caucasians range in melanin from pale fair haired NW European's to very dark Dravidians and all other native people of the Indian subcontinent. The human genome project/DNA prove the migration of humanity on Earth.
I despise that we do not have words for all humans that are not based on color and the idiotic populism surrounding this weakness of the English language. So-called 'Blacks' have a quite wide diversity of Melanin ranging from very light to very dark as well. Melanin is autonomic and driven by Geography, weather, and diet and no human being is accountable. Judging people by skin color is racist and prejudicial behavior of everyone who does it - regardless of ethnicity.
'White' people; Caucasians, aren't White.
Africans are not 'Black'.
We are all human beings from the same Race - the HUMAN race.
As is true throughout nature, the Human Race has a diversity of phenotypes, but they all belong to the Human Race.
Unfortunately StarTrek wasn't "bold" enough to elucidate the axiomatic Logically certain Truth about Race because Star Trek was never about anything but money, popularity, and social propaganda.
Never forget the who, how, and why of the so-called 'entertainment industry'. If you're not aware of 'who' invented Network Broadcast Television and 'why they did so - you're a fool for watching. The 'entertainment industry' and television serve only one purpose - propaganda. If you're not educated in psychological operations, psychological warfare, public relations, civil affairs , or propaganda - you are completely unaware of how civilization functions.
Read Edward Bernays book Propaganda. It's the best starting point for diving into the Bernays rabbit hole of arrogant psychosis.