Humanity Is Inching Toward Huxley's Dark Prophecy
"The dictatorship of the future, I think will be very unlike the dictatorships which we've been familiar with in the immediate past," the Brave New World author observed in a 1958 interview.
A decade and half after the publication of Brave New World (1931), Aldous Huxley penned a foreword to his magnum opus that has attracted relatively little attention.
Written shortly after the conclusion of the World War II, the article is fascinating in both its frenetic pace and bold conclusions, some of which appear prescient, others absurd.
After opining on what he perceived as the weaknesses in Brave New World, Huxley went on to discuss the natural societal confusion that accompanies periods of social upheaval and rapid technological advancement, and touched on the widespread centralization and expansion of government that followed the Second World War.
He then matter-of-factly laid out a somewhat dire and jarring prediction:
“It’s probable that all the world’s governments will be more or less completely totalitarian even before the harnessing of atomic energy; that they will be totalitarian during and after the harnessing seems almost certain. Only a large-scale popular movement toward decentralization and self-help can arrest the present tendency toward statism. At present there is no sign that such a movement will take place.”
Now, it’s important to note that Huxley quickly adds that he did not expect the new totalitarianism to resemble the old. The artificial famines, firing squads, and mass imprisonments were “demonstrably inefficient”; an efficient totalitarian state would control “a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.”
That would be the Manhattan Project of the future, he believed, and it would first require economic security, for, “without economic security, the love of servitude cannot possibly come into existence.”
Huxley presumed that economic security would be achieved rather easily. The more difficult work of inculcating a love of servitude would involve a more personal revolution, one involving “human minds and bodies.”
The four steps?
Improved technique of suggestion, including “infant conditioning.”
A more robust understanding of human differences.
A substitute for alcohol and the narcotics of his day (“something at once less harmful and more pleasure-giving”).
A foolproof system of eugenics.
He glumly concluded that the horror of Brave New World “may be upon us in a single century.”
Where to begin? I confess that in parts of the essay Huxley sounds a bit like a prepper who has drank too much cough syrup. But I also found it refreshing to read an intellectual of Huxley’s stature point out that in humanity’s steady march of progress, humans may arrive at their Utopia only to discover it’s a nightmare.
In a 1958 interview (see below) with Mike Wallace, Huxley elaborated on his thesis.
"The dictatorship of the future, I think will be very unlike the dictatorships which we've been familiar with in the immediate past. I mean, take another book prophesying the future, which was a very remarkable book, George Orwell's 1984.
There he foresaw a dictatorship using entirely the methods of terror; methods of physical violence. I think what is going to happen in the future is that dictators will find, as the old saying goes, that they can do everything with bayonets except sit on them. If you want to preserve your power indefinitely you have to get the consent of the ruled. And this they will do partly by these new techniques of propaganda. They will do it by bypassing the rational side of man and appealing to his subconscious and his deeper emotions and his physiology even. And so making him actually love his slavery.
I think this is the danger, that actually people may be in some ways happy under the new regime. But they will be happy in situations where they ought not to be happy.”
If one looks at America in 2024, Huxley looks awfully prescient. We are saturated in propaganda, and much of it is driven directly by state puppeteers. The notion that we have an “independent” media is pure fantasy. Legacy media now do the bidding of government agencies, unapologetically and in plain sight.
Is this trend toward totalitarianism—soft or hard—reversible? Of course, but I agree with Huxley that it will require a “large-scale popular movement toward decentralization and self-help.”
And for the time being, America’s two dominant political parties are not interested in either of these solutions, which tells me things will get worse before they get better.
Spot on
Excellent.