11 Comments
User's avatar
DMC's avatar

However, the supposedly sane, moderate Democrats will vote for the Democrat party no matter what. It the era of Trump that may be explainable but if you give more than 5 seconds of thought to it is insane. We have textbooks examples of total failure in our cities and some of our states. at the seem time we have thriving states like Florida and Texas. Look at where people are moving to, and from. (Works in reverse too. the homeless are moving to California.) f they are not willing to recognize success in deference to party allegiance based on social standing they deserve what is coming at them.

The problem is, while I don't mind if someone I don't agree with shoots themselves in the foot, its a problem if they are standing on my head.

Patrick T. Peterson's avatar

Excellent!

KurtOverley's avatar

Socialism is driven by the siren song of "free stuff". Of course, other people's money quickly evaporates, scarcity surges and quality of life decays.

Gregg Wolf's avatar

The Democrats have always advocated for Socialism, orSocialist policies, now it seems like they are simply no longer hiding it.

Joseph Gergetz's avatar

None of the links in your article seem to work.

Laurence Mailaender's avatar

Today’s Democratic movement is nothing like the ‘socialism’ you are talking about. Strawman? Fear mongering? Shill for the status quo? Jon, our current capitalism is corrupted by billionaire’s money that prevents democracy from working. Extreme wealth concentration and Citizens United stops single payer healthcare, fair tax on billionaires, closing loopholes, gun control, abortion rights, etc which are all extremely popular. Wealth concentration harms economic growth by suppressing demand and encouraging speculation. Your trickle-down system was tried and it led to the dysfunctional economy we have now. People are fed up. The rich have been practicing class warfare for 40 years.

Dee's avatar

Excellent essay, Jon, as always. However, tariffs are not unconstitutional. Indeed, they are a simple (and sophisticated) negotiating tool -- a temporary device that can "level the playing field," so to speak. In actuality, they are the great equalizer, economically speaking, and as regards trade specifically. There is a priority evidence for this fact.

Jon Miltimore's avatar

I'm not saying tariffs themselves are unconstitutional. I'm saying those particular tariffs were, and the Supreme Court agreed with me.

Laurence Mailaender's avatar

Tariffs lead to decoupling the world economy, which leads to inflation.

Patrick T. Peterson's avatar

tariffs often lead to worse: war!

NDDV's avatar

One person Socialism is another person Mahomedanism