12 Truth-Bombs Courtesy of Milton Friedman
The Economist has described Friedman as “a giant among economists” and “the most influential economist of the second half of the 20th century.”
American economist Milton Friedman rose to prominence in the second half of the 20th century as one of the leading critics of the prevailing economic theories of John Maynard Keynes, whose mixed economy model became the standard for many developed nations during and after the World War II-era.
Born in Brooklyn to a Jewish family of modest means in 1912, Friedman distinguished himself scholastically at a young age. After graduating high school at age 16, he attended Rutgers University where he studied math and economics. He continued his education at the University of Chicago, where he received an MA in economics and would ultimately retire in 1977 after more than 30 years of teaching—a year after receiving the Nobel Prize for his contributions to economic science. Friedman continued writing and speaking publicly through various mediums—magazine columns and television, academic journals and newspaper op-eds—until his death in 2006.
The Economist has described Friedman as “a giant among economists” and “the most influential economist of the second half of the 20th century.”
Here are 12 things the author of Free to Choose said to serve as food for thought:
1. “Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself.”- The Relation Between Economic Freedom and Political Freedom, 2002
2. “I’m in favor of legalizing drugs. According to my values system, if people want to kill themselves, they have every right to do so. Most of the harm that comes from drugs is because they are illegal.”- As quoted in If Ignorance Is Bliss, Why Aren’t There More Happy People? (2009)
3. “With some notable exceptions, businessmen favor free enterprise in general but are opposed to it when it comes to themselves.” – Lecture “The Suicidal Impulse of the Business Community” (1983)
4. “It’s a moral problem that the government is making into criminals people, who may be doing something you and I don’t approve of, but who are doing something that hurts nobody else.” America’s Drug Forum interview (1991)
5. “One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results.” – Interview with Richard Heffner on The Open Mind (Dec.7, 1975)
6. “You must distinguish sharply between being pro free enterprise and being pro business.” Big Business, Big Government (1978)
7. “The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither. The society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great measure of both.” – From Created Equal, an episode of the PBS Free to Choose television series (1980)
8. “Governments never learn; only people learn.” – As quoted in The Cynic’s Lexicon : A Dictionary Of Amoral Advice? (1984)
9. “We have to recognize that we must not hope for a Utopia that is unattainable. I would like to see a great deal less government activity than we have now, but I do not believe that we can have a situation in which we don’t need government at all.” – As quoted in The Times Herald, Norristown, Pennsylvania (Dec. 1, 1978)
10. “The great virtue of a free market system is that it does not care what color people are; it does not care what their religion is; it only cares whether they can produce something you want to buy. It is the most effective system we have discovered to enable people who hate one another to deal with one another and help one another.” – “Why Government Is the Problem” (February 1, 1993), p. 19
11. “The case for prohibiting drugs is exactly as strong and as weak as the case for prohibiting people from overeating. We all know that overeating causes more deaths than drugs do.” – America’s Drug Forum interview (1991)
12. “There are four ways in which you can spend money. You can spend your own money on yourself. When you do that, why then you really watch out what you’re doing, and you try to get the most for your money. Then you can spend your own money on somebody else. For example, I buy a birthday present for someone. Well, then I’m not so careful about the content of the present, but I’m very careful about the cost. Then, I can spend somebody else’s money on myself. And if I spend somebody else’s money on myself, then I’m sure going to have a good lunch! Finally, I can spend somebody else’s money on somebody else. And if I spend somebody else’s money on somebody else, I’m not concerned about how much it is, and I’m not concerned about what I get. And that’s government. And that’s close to 40 percent of our national income.” – Fox News interview (May 2004)
A version of this article first appeared on Intellectual Takeout.
Milton Friedman nailed it every time.
As great as Friedman was, Rothbard jokingly referred to him as a “road socialist”, because Friedman was incapable of making the leap to AnCapistan (full separation of Economy and State). More recently, economist Richard Koo has pointed out significant breakdowns with Friedman’s Monetary Theory around recessions: according to Friedman, the Great Depression was caused by the Fed’s failure to properly maintain the money supply in the midst of a rapidly deflating economy. Koo coined the term “Balance Sheet Recession” to identify the regime switching behavior of individuals and firms who, in the aftermath of an asset bubble burst, switch from profit maximization to debt minimization. This debt minimization behavior occurred again after the real estate bubble collapse in Japan in the ‘90s and to the rest of the world following our Housing Bubble of ‘08. Firms and individuals devoting spare cash flow to repairing their balance sheets are completely unresponsive to the standard central bank tools of lowering interest rates or even Quantitative Easing. Koo instead proposes to soak up excess private sector savings with fiscal spending on self financing infrastructure projects, thus maintaining the general income level to avoid the “paradox of thrift” in which private sector debt minimization by all sharply reduces incomes, leading to recession.